The story from NBC4 News in Columbus:
Protestors Picket Columbus Against California Law
Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 – 03:38 PM [ed note: 20 minutes before the rally ended.]
By Laurie Omness
E-mail
COLUMBUS, Ohio
More than 100 people turned up at City Hall in Columbus Saturday, carrying signs and expressing disapproval of a California referendum that did away with gay marriage.
NBC 4 reported that it was one of many events planned across the country.
A California Supreme Court decision that had legalized same-sex marriage was overturned by voters on Election Day.
Ohio also bars gay marriage under a state constitutional amendment adopted by voters in 2004.
Protests also were in Cleveland, Cincinnati, Dayton, Toledo and Bowling Green State University.
By midday on Friday, the Facebook.com page for the rally outside Columbus City Hall indicated more than 500 people were planning to attend.
Local organizers at least 100 people have signed up for a rally on Dayton’s Courthouse Square.
Gay-rights advocates say at least 150 rallies are planned nationwide.
—–
Thanks to the ever fabulous Clay, I sent this message to her:
Dear Ms. Omness:
It may seem, from your perspective, that Saturday’s protests in Columbus were merely a response to California’s passage of Proposition 8, however, those of us actually there protesting would disagree with you, and would like to correct a few things in your story.
While technically correct, “over 100 people,” would be more accurate if you used the term, “over 300 people.” And “at least 150″ would be more accurately expressed with the expression, “over 175 protests comprised of over a million people.”
And since we’re arguing semantics here, the protest was NOT in response to Proposition 8, but in actuality, it was in response to the overwhelming backslide that the United States of America has been taking lately in terms of civil rights. Proposition 8 is just the tip of the iceberg. There’s also proposition 102 in Arizona, proposition 2 in Florida, and the attempt in Connecticut to call a Constitutional Congress with the specific purpose of eliminating the right for same sex couples to marry.
So, your trivialization of the protest in Columbus is also trivializing the fight for equality that same sex couples all over the United States are fighting right now. I hope you will take that into consideration the next time you provide “coverage” of a civil rights news event.
Sincerely,
Me
—–
She sent back:
Thanks for your response—-our photographer got there late in proceedings; so we thought there may have been more people there earlier. As for content, that was boilerplate from the AP story: we didn’t have a reporter to go so it was a much more generic story than if it had occurred during a weekday.
….it was really quite an accomplishment, I thought, to coordinate that kind of effort and the turnout on a bad weather day is commendable. Please keep us posted if other events are planned.
—–
Not good enough. I sent back:
Thank you very much for the insight on the story. It’s a shame that there isn’t more concern by your superiors for civil rights issues that inconveniently happen on the weekends. If you could pass my displeasure on to them, I would appreciate it.
—–
Seriously? The article made us look frivolous and petulant. Over a million people nationwide. Hello? Um, isn’t it the job of the news to, y’know, report the damn news? Oh, wait. It would be, if there was such a thing as journalistic integrity left in this fucking country.